Halfway through university, here's what I would tell my younger self who would have been yet to start

It's been almost two years since I wrote on this blog. In fact, my last article was written in my first week of university. I've not written since then, probably because the reason for me starting this blog was because I did not have anything else to do during the first Lockdown in 2020 (in hindsight, should have probably prepped better for JEE). Anyway, since this is the first article I'm writing over the past two years of starting, here's what I would probably tell my younger self:

1) Trying too much, or trying too little- both don't completely close the door of regret. But the latter is probably harder to deal with. Simply because with the former, you always know that it wasn't because of lack of effort on your part. As stated earlier, I probably could have prepared for various entrance examinations better, particularly JEE, even though I did not have an interest in pursuing engineering, which takes me to the second point.

2) Don't pursue something just because everyone is after it, and more importantly, don't ignore something just because everyone is after it. When deciding on plans after school, being a science student, everyone's question to me was- "NEET or JEE?". Being the rebellious teenager that I was (and honestly, who wasn't?), I did not want to pursue either because everyone seemed to be doing that. Hence, even though I enjoyed Mathematics and Physics, I decided to not pursue engineering because it seemed too cliché. Now, even though I'm pursuing what I love, I've also realised that I enjoy programming, although I'm just getting started with it. Who knows what might have happened had I taken up Computer Science?

3) Your choice of University matters more for your growth as an individual rather than for your career plans (although your individual growth might play a role in that). While applying to various colleges, I was pretty clear that I would prefer to go away from the southern part of the country. Not because we don't have good colleges here, but because I believed that the exposure of moving away from home will help me, and even though I've only spent six months on campus, the kind of people I've met and interacted with has undoubtedly had a huge impact on me, and in hindsight, while looking at the other universities that accepted me, I believe that I've made the right decision with the one I chose.

4) People may not always agree with you, and that's okay as long as you’re willing to listen to them. Attending university means that you’re bound to come across people from a variety of cultural, economic, social and educational backgrounds. Naturally, there are bound to be differences of opinion. However, as long as you’re willing to listen to their POV, while still not allowing yourself to be a pushover, that’s all that matters. Don't be worried about whether they're willing to listen to you. That's their loss (or possible benefit). As long as you keep an open mind and think critically, you'll find more value in disagreements than agreements.

5) While you can't plan everything precisely, things always work themselves out in the end as long as you've made the effort to make the best possible decision. While deciding on what to pursue in university, I was horribly confused. I had an interest in every aspect of academic study, and it was certainly, as my old man said, a problem of plenty. However, I knew for certain that I enjoyed problem solving. Hence, I decided to pursue Mathematics, as studying Math could help me in almost every field known to mankind, in case I ever decided to leave it. It turns out my choice of university mattered as well, because after taking a couple of Economics Classes, I decided I wanted to study Economics, after never having studied it before joining college. As my University provides students the option to change their Major after their first year (subject to certain constraints), I decided to do that, and I'm so glad I did.

PSG vs FCB: A French and German Tale

Paris Saint-Germain vs Bayern Munich. One team was a dominant continental force at the start of the decade, while the other one, flooded with cash, was looking to make it's mark. They were the ones to beat in this season's UEFA Champions League ever since the knockouts began. While Bayern walk into the final looking ruthless and dominant, PSG have had to fight extremely tough 'mental' battles to get here. After a comeback against Borussia Dortmund in the RO16 and squeezing past Atalanta in the final few minutes of the last eight, they came up with a dominant performance against Red Bull Leipzig in the penultimate round, with Neymar pulling the strings like a spider. Bayern on the other hand...well, I don't need to say anything other than this: they beat Spanish 'Giants' Barcelona 8-2 in the last eight. When they meet in today's final, the stage is set for perhaps one of the most awaited one's yet.

As both teams line-up and the UCL anthem plays, you would probably be able to feel the nerves of every PSG and FCB fan around the world, while neutral fans like me can hardly wait for kick-off. Both teams are star-studded, have the money-power to attract top stars and have made a name for themselves in their respective leagues, winning them this year as well. Head-to-Head, they've come up against each other in the group stages for eight matches, with PSG winning five of them. Who will come out on top in this one-off encounter? Let's break it down.

Starting from the back, we have Manuel Neuer for FCB and Keylor Navas (if he plays) for PSG. Although the former plays a more risky game, for Bayern it could be just what they need given how high of a defensive line they hold. Navas, who missed the semi-final due to injury, could be available for the final, and hence this battle will be reasonably even. However, should Sergio Rico have to fill in for the Costa Rican goalkeeper, we can clearly see Bayern has the edge in this area.

Both teams play the tried and tested four at the back, but Bayern seem to have a clear edge here in terms of the one's on the flanks. Bernat and Kehrer are good, but they aren't as good as Davies and Kimmich. The latter pair will start ahead of Pavard and Hernandez tonight, and lets keep in mind that they have benched a World Cup winning pair, shall we? While PSG have played with Thiago Silva and Kimpembe in the back during the past two games, the return of Verrati in midfield could push Marquinhos back into a centre-back role, but as to who he will replace remains to be found out tonight. Bayern of course, will start with Boateng and Alaba and will be playing an extremely high line, which they can afford given the pacey nature of their defence and Neuer's sweeping abilities, but is it wise to do so against PSG's forward line?

Let's keep the forwards away for now. Bayern playing a 4-2-3-1 have a very solid duo in the middle. The technically skilled Thiago and the physically gifted Goretzka. The latter plays a very huge role in the Bayern set-up. Because of his physical presence in the middle of the park, it affords Thiago acres of space and those precious extra seconds to play those killer passes from deep. By contrast, PSG have no notable names who can dominate the middle single-handedly, save maybe Verratti, and Bayern seem to have the clear edge here. PSG, playing a straightforward 4-3-3, will probably be replying heavily on their forward line. 

While Bayern have Lewandowski alone up front, supported by Muller just behind and Perisic and Gnabry on the flanks, PSG have a trio of Neymar, Mbappe and Di Maria, and thus obviously pack a much stronger punch. Although Bayern has the highest goals scored per game, and PSG the second most this season (yeah, this final will hopefully have a lot of them), most defenders would prefer to play against Bayern, even with the threatening presence of Lewandowski, who has 55 goals this season across all competitions. The reason being simple: they are relatively easier to defend and play against. Bayern attack in a very orthodox manner, with passes being played out wide and then crosses put into the box, or with long balls into the centre from deep which is then put into the net after one or two touches. With Gnabry and Perisic, they also have two players capable of scoring with flat, powerful strikes from the sides or just outside the box.

PSG on the other hand, are unpredictable. When you have a trio of Neymar, Mbappe and Di Maria, which is very fast, creative and fluid, you do not want to be the opposing backline. The way Neymar pulls the strings for Di Maria and Mbappe to exploit is a joy to watch. He toys with defenders, drawing them in, buying fouls. Messi is known for drawing defenders to him, Cristiano Ronaldo wins several fouls with his step overs, but neither of them do it with the same aesthetic pleasure as Neymar. He truly is a joy to watch when it's his day. Standing tall, drawing defenders in, exploding with pace and finally slipping the ball ever so gently for someone to score. These Brazilians are truly the reason why it's called 'The Beautiful Game'.  

By winning fouls in dangerous places, Neymar offers PSG the opportunity to score with a dead ball. We witnessed this once again in their semi-final against Leipzig, as Di Maria crossed deliciously for Marquinhos to head the ball in. The Argentinean was in impeccable touch, setting up two goals and scoring another in that game. He might well be the difference if not Neymar or Mbappe. Ah, Kylian Mbappe. Ever since taking the world by storm during Monaco's remarkable 2016-17 UCL campaign, the Golden Boy has only improved exponentially each season. With his devastating pace and trickery filled legs, Mbappe will be itching to run against this extremely high Bayern backline. Can he outrun Davies and Alaba? Let's find out tonight, shall we? 

As for the substitutes, both benches are reasonably stacked although Bayern's may be better on paper. Names like Coutinho, Draxler, Icardi and Coman amongst others will be itching to have a run out there on the biggest night in club football. Will it be Bayern's sixth or PSG's first? I'm going with Bayern, whose experience and big game mentality may just see them through, but with this PSG frontline, you never know, do you?  

The Resurgence of the Reds: Liverpool's Ruthless Line-up

30 Years. It's been 30 years since Liverpool last won the league. From being England's dominant team, they became dreadful with respect to their own past. They did win the Champions League in 2005, but their performances and ability to constantly win silverware as they once did was already in decline. Sure, there were occasional moments where they seemed to have got their mojo back. Players such as Torres and Suarez made 'scousers' all over the world think that their glory days had arrived once again, only for the team to hit hurdles during the final stretches of the season. 

The arrival of Klopp, several months after the team had once again missed out on the Premiership in 2014, seems to be the best decision made in the history of the club, as the Reds have gone on to become the most deadly club team in the world. A couple of European final losses with incomplete squads was indeed a significant achievement, but not enough for Klopp. Bit by bit he reshaped the team, molded them like clay in his hands, and in 2019 he had unveiled his masterpiece. 

Key transfers based on players who would suit his style, rather than big names that would demand hefty salaries, have always been a part of the 'Klopp DNA'. This doesn't mean Klopp shies away from opening his wallet. The arrival of centre-back Virgil van Dijk and goalkeeper Alisson Becker demanded a big spend, but it was money spent well.

Together, they were the foundation of Liverpool's structure. The way they guard the Liverpool goal seems to have an air of nonchalance, as if they don't seem to be putting in any effort. Wanna know how good Alisson is? Just go to Youtube and watch clips of him in action. I need not say more. Watching Virgil play the ball out of the back, it seems to me he's casually walking around in his garden, kicking the ball around with his feet. He has had three defensive partners ever since he arrived. Lovren, Matip and now Gomez. Each one seems to be an improvement over the previous one, and a parallel can be seen in the sense that the team has improved with each addition.

Flanking the two centre-backs are arguably the best wing-back pair in today's game, Andy Robertson and Trent Alexander-Arnold. You can argue that they may be lacking defensively when compared to others in their role, but no one suits this Liverpool system better. Racking up more goal contributions than many top quality forwards over the past three years, this is a devastating duo.

As we move on towards the midfield, one name stands out. Jordan Henderson. What a leader he has been. Many have doubted his capability to not just play top-flight football, but to also captain the Liverpool team for several years. During the initial months of van Dijk's arrival, there was quite a demand for Henderson to be stripped off the captaincy, with the armband going to the imposing Dutchman. However, over the last couple of seasons there has been a remarkable turnaround. Not only has he demonstrated his excellent leadership qualities, Henderson has evolved into a 'don't notice, but don't win without' player. Without his presence on the pitch, Liverpool are like a car engine that just doesn't run as smooth as it should. 

One reason for the improvement in Henderson's performance is the arrival of Fabinho. Liverpool have really lacked a top quality holding midfielder over the past few years, and his arrival from Monaco has certainly sorted that issue. Despite taking a bit of time to settle in, over the past two years, he has become the lynchpin in this Liverpool side. The role of holding midfielders has become extremely important in the modern game and Fabinho is certainly one of the better ones. His presence has also allowed Henderson to push further forward, as he no longer has to act as a 'water-carrier' and this is what has led to an improved performance from him on the pitch.

The final piece of Liverpool's 'big-game midfield' is Gini Wijnaldum. Another Dutchman, his name isn't the one you see on the back of most shirts, yet he's an energy bank. Like a bolt of lightning, he powers up the Liverpool midfield, and contributes with crucial goals when required. Who can forget those two monumental goals on that magical night against Barcelona? He's the engine block of this team, and certainly packs plenty of horsepower!

Now, to the front three: Mane, Firmino and Salah. What a front three! Inverted Wingers and a False Nine! Now a lot of people say "Oh, Firmino doesn't score that many goals, I wonder why he's even there". These people don't understand football. He's the one who glues this front three together. By dropping back into the space between the opposing lines and linking up the play between Liverpool's midfield and forward line, he creates space for Salah and Mane to run into and hence they can take full advantage of their pace. He also scores when required, and is probably one of the most, if not the most, well-rounded players in this Liverpool side. As for Salah and Mane, I don't even need to explain how good they are. Their stats speak for themselves.

This is usually Klopp's go-to starting line-up for most games. Apart from these eleven superstars, they have pretty impressive firepower as backup. James Milner, Naby Keita, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, Xherdan Shaqiri and of course, Divock Origi, all occupy the substitutes bench. Milner plays pretty often, given his versatility and is often used as a replacement for almost any position during big games.

To conclude, this Liverpool squad is a ruthless well-oiled machine which is capable of tearing apart any opponent on any given day. Just as Barcelona dominated the first half of this decade, and Real Madrid the second, I don't hesitate to state that this Liverpool side is the one to be reckoned with over the next five years. Watching them play is a feast for the eyes, fast-moving attacking football played the English way. After years of watching the slow style of Spanish teams dominate world football, this is certainly a more than welcome change. With a Champions League and Premier League title under their belt, this team is just getting started!

TOP FIVE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE TEAMS OF THIS CENTURY

The history of the beautiful game has seen several great teams light up European Club Football's greatest stage: The Champions League. However, there are few teams in particular that have stood out. Let's take a look at five of those teams from the current century, with each club being represented by only one team in case of multiple victories:

5. Manchester United (2007-2008)

Manchester United has reached the zenith of European football three times, the latest victory coming in 2008. Boasting a sturdy defence and capable midfield, United quickly became the team to beat as they boasted a marauding front line of Carlos Tevez, Wayne Rooney and Cristiano Ronaldo, who was emerging as the world's best player. Filled with fast, hungry and energetic youngsters, as well as experienced players of the previous triumph in 1999, United ripped apart opposition on their road to glory, finding a way to win even during hopeless cases.

4. AC Milan (2006-2007)

Defeated by Liverpool in 2005, 'That Night in Istanbul' must have inflicted a deep scar in the minds of anyone associated with Milan. However, they stood strong and from tears came joy, as the Rossoneri lifted the trophy in 2007, which had so painfully eluded them in 2005. From the veteran Maldini to the maestro Pirlo, Milan oozed talent in every position. A resounding victory over Manchester United in the semi-finals left no doubt as to who was Europe's top team that year. With a vastly improved and dangerous Kaká leading the way, the memories of Istanbul were buried at last.

3. Barcelona (2014-2015)

The sides of 2009 and 2011, widely regarded as the greatest teams of all time, do not make the list. The team of 2015 does. Unlike the previous sides which had to ride their luck at times on the way to the final, this Barcelona needed no such thing. With a forward line of Messi, Suarez and Neymar, I need not explain myself further. Throw in a dash of midfield experience through Iniesta and Busquets and defensive solidity thanks to Pique and Dani Alves, this Barcelona team was the one to beat. 

2015 > 2009, 2011 (when it comes to the Champions League).

2. Bayern Munich (2012-2013)

Bayern in 2010 and 2012 were so close, yet so far. However in 2013, they formed one of the most dominant teams in European history. Perhaps the greatest team to have won just a single European title in a given period with the same squad, Bayern shocked the world by defeating Barcelona 7-0 in the semi-finals. With Robben and Ribery on the wings, Bayern was perhaps the first major team to depict the use of two top-quality inverted wingers on the flanks. Couple that with their sturdy defence, controlling midfield and their keeper Manuel Neuer's unique 'sweeping' talents, this Bayern team could beat any other team. Except the next one.

1. Real Madrid (2017-2018) 

Obviously. The only team to have won two consecutive titles, let alone three, since the complete revival of the competition as the Champions League, Real Madrid of 2018 are undoubtedly the greatest Champions League team of this century. Despite riding their luck a bit during the two previous campaigns in 2016 and 2017, in 2018 it was pure class and domination.

Defeating the French, Italian and German champions en route to the final, where they beat the most successful English team in Europe, Real Madrid's third consecutive title was undoubtedly the one where they stamped their authority on the competition. With the world's best players at every position, and a re-modelled Ronaldo, Real Madrid were the masters of the European game.

.....

Other brilliant teams include the Barcelona teams of 2009 and 2011, the Real Madrid side of 2014, Inter Milan in 2010 and Liverpool in 2019. The Barcelona teams rode their luck way too often in crucial stages in the competition, most notably in both their semi-finals in 2009 and 2011 against Chelsea and Real Madrid, where bad decisions favoured them. As for Real Madrid in 2014, they were a minute away from losing the final, and narrowly beat Dortmund in the last eight, despite crushing Bayern in the penultimate round. Inter is debatable, but they relied heavily on Mourinho's brilliant tactics, and as for Liverpool, they were great, but they faced teams that were a shadow of their former selves.

The 'Biased Basis' of the GOAT Debate- Part 3

In my previous posts, Part 1 and Part 2, I had brought up the topic of how defenders and midfielders weren't given as much credit as strikers or forwards on an individual basis. One of the reasons for this could be that defence is a collective responsibility of the entire team. So what value does a single high quality defender or defensive minded midfielder add to a team?

Before we get into that, let us first look at how teams defend. There are several defensive strategies followed by teams. From possession based football that follows the ideology 'if we have the ball, the opposition can't score' to the age-old 'catennacio' style of football that relies on solid defending by soaking up the pressure and then counter-attacking swiftly, the possibilities are endless. 

However, three principles are followed irrespective of what defensive strategy is used.

The first one is maintaining formation or team structure, whether as an entire team or in certain sections of the pitch, and this has to be followed. If players are randomly organised without any particular arrangement, confusion arises which leads to chaos. Second is marking, whether it is man-to-man marking or zonal marking, and it is a must. Teams generally prefer the former for set-pieces and the latter for open play. The third is pressing, or anything similar which is used to win the ball back. 

Now, the defenders and midfielders have to be the most cautious about maintaining and sticking to their positions as they form the backbone of the team's structure. Attacking midfielders, strikers and modern wingers typically have a much more free role, and are allowed to roam anywhere along the front line. This is because their 'roaming' causes problems for the opposition defence. However, defensive players need to maintain their shape and structure in order to prevent gaps from opening up. Hence, a large portion of a team's defensive capabilities depends on how well they are organised. 

Hence, defensive players have to be highly aware of how their fellow teammates are positioned, as well as where their opponents are. Defenders play 'an intelligent game', not a beautiful one. Maldini himself famously said that if he had to make a tackle, it meant that he had already made a mistake. Someone else, either a fellow defender or even a forward could also have given the ball away, and hence a defender has to position himself thinking about all those aspects as well. 

Therefore, although a striker or forward's contribution can be measured in terms of dribbles, key passes, chances created, assists and goals, a defenders contribution cannot be measured in terms of tackles, interceptions and duels won. This is merely because a defender would have positioned himself in such a manner that there would be no need for the tackle or other things to be made in the first place.

Another important thing, which is often not talked about enough in my opinion, is how great defenders have an invisible effect on teams as well as on other individuals within the team, and if you look into any forward who has won an individual award, I am sure that it was only because of those behind them. Literally those behind them. 

Let us take some examples from this very decade to prove this point. Liverpool until the 2017-18 season were a shadow of their former self. Enter Virgil van Dijk. A tall imposing central defender who completely changed the way they played. Yes, they did have an already impressive trio of Salah, Mane and Firmino up front, but the Dutchman's introduction completely changed the way Liverpool played. They no longer had to worry about their defence because van Dijk's imposing presence and dominance at the back, not to mention prodigious defensive skill, was like using a titanium lock on an otherwise open door.

Although Virgil van Dijk was awarded the UEFA Best Men's Player in 2019, he was
beaten by Lionel Messi for both the FIFA Best Player as well as the Ballon d'Or.
Credits: Eurasia Sport Images/Getty Images

Another example from recent times, Real Madrid. In this case I want to talk about two very important positions that were critical for their team. One is Sergio Ramos at the heart of their defence. Now one of the reasons Madrid was very successful in European competitions, aside from the fact that they had incredibly talented and experienced players, was their system. Apart from being able to retain possession and dominate the midfield area, they had two of the best players at full-back, Marcelo and Carvajal. Marcelo was the more attack-minded of the two, and he was often the most advanced player on the left flank (he even stood at the halfway-line during kick-off), which meant that there was huge gap in Madrid's defensive line. Nothing to worry about though, because Sergio Ramos covered that entire side all alone, and his domineering presence was so good that Marcelo could literally live in the opposition's half. Ramos' effect is perhaps more noticed when he's absent, as Madrid leaked goals faster than Usain Bolt running a sprint, such as in the second legs against Ajax in the 2018-19 season and Juventus in 2017-18, and when he is present, Madrid flood their opposition's box and you get 'goals, more goals and even more goals'.

The second player is Casemiro. A Central Defensive Midfielder (CDM), he was perhaps the most crucial piece of the team. Casemiro is like the engine of an expensive car. No one looking at the car can see the engine. They all look at how it looks, how the seats feel etc. If the car doesn't start, only then they look at the engine. Real Madrid won the Champions League in 2013-2014. The next season, they upgraded their midfield by acquiring both Toni Kroos as well as James Rodriguez. However, they failed to defend their title as they played with three midfielders who were terrible at CDM, which Xabi Alonso (who had moved to Bayern) played with such finesse for them the previous year. Next season, enter Casemiro, and they win three consecutive Champions Leagues.

From the above examples and the various explanations across all three posts, it is obvious that while forwards play the beautiful game, defenders play an intelligent one, and the human tendency is to focus on beauty. Not until you spend enough time with a person, will you realize how intelligent they are, Similarly, even several experts may be biased towards what they see, over what has to be understood and thought out.

Defensive contributions to the game, such as maintaining formations, playing a forward offside, positioning yourself perfectly to block the angles for a pass or a shot, controlling the tempo of the game, all these involve the mind more than the body. It is therefore no surprise that the most revered managers who were also brilliant players, such as Guardiola, Zidane and Beckenbauer, were midfielders or defenders. It takes a lot more than prodigious skill on the ball to be a great manager, and perhaps that's the reason why Maradona failed as a manager for Argentina. There are exceptions however, as Cruyff was a forward and yet was perhaps the most influential manager in terms of how the modern game is played.

To conclude, you cannot actually decide on who is the best player. You can perhaps debate on who the greatest forward, midfielder, defender and goalkeeper are, but never on the best overall player. Even among those positions, variations in playing style exist. For example, an inverted winger will most certainly have a higher goal contribution than a traditional one, so how again do we divide them?

In my opinion, there needs to be a separate award for each position. Currently however, there are only awards that distinguish between goalkeepers and all outfield players.

As for deciding who the GOAT is, we can perhaps imagine a virtual tournament in our head where each team is composed of 11 identical copies of the same player. The winner of that tournament could certainly be considered the greatest player of all time. Imagine 11 Lionel Messi's against 11 Cristiano Ronaldo's. If we held a tournament like that considering every single player to have ever played the game at their prime, who would win? I'm backing Beckenbauer or Zidane. What about you?

The 'Biased Basis' of the GOAT Debate- Part 2

In my previous post, I had brought up the topic of how the public, and even the experts perceive forwards or attack-minded players in football to be 'better' than defensive players on an individual level. Statistics prove this seeing that more individual awards, higher shirt sales, higher salaries and transfer fees, are all linked to attack-minded players. 

Now in the average football match, we had seen how an individual player usually has the ball for only 2-3 minutes per game at most, and how for the 87 minutes they do not have the ball, they are utilizing their 'off the ball' skills. Having seen how various kinds of players utilize those few minutes that they do have the ball, let us now see how these players utilize the time when each player does not have the ball.

Now just because the individual player does not have the ball, does not mean that his team isn't in possession of the ball. Hence, let us divide 'off the ball skills' into two categories; one when the player's team has possession of the ball and the other when the opposition has it.

In this post, let us look at what attack-minded players do without the ball irrespective of whether its their team that has possession or whether it's the opposition.

Let us assume two teams are playing, TEAM A and TEAM B. Now if TEAM A is in possession of the ball, and the ball is with their defensive minded players, what the attacking players of TEAM A will look to do is provide an outlet for their teammates to pass the ball to them. Not only will this relieve the pressure on their teammates as they won't have to pass the ball around in dangerous areas anymore, but it will also put pressure on TEAM B as the ball is now closer to their goal, and it's also with players who will pose a much greater threat in terms of scoring goals. 

Forwards of the team in white shirts 'pressing'
defenders of the team in black shirts.

Now when TEAM A's defenders and defensive players have the ball, the 'forwards' of TEAM B will look to 'press', i.e. they will move around chasing the players of TEAM A who have the ball in a systemic manner. The goal of 'pressing' is to put pressure on opposition defenders and not give them too much time on the ball, and hence 'pressurize' them into making a mistake and thus regain possession. 

Once TEAM A's attack minded players get the ball, they attempt to constantly move the ball around and switch it from one side of the field to another, and as they do this, they also continuously move around, and make runs into empty spaces so that they can receive the ball from a teammate when they have a lot of room around them to do something, either play the final ball, take a shot at goal, or even get a few extra moments to decide what to do. Either way, their constant moving around also provides more options to their teammates and makes life more difficult for the opposition as they have to move around with these players, thus tiring them out.

Thus the defenders from TEAM B will not only have to keep their eyes on the ball, but will also have to make sure they know where exactly TEAM A's forwards are. They shall also have to move around along with these forwards individually, while at the same time maintain structure. Hence, forwards generally try to occupy positions or make runs where it will be difficult for the defender to keep an eye on both the ball as well as the forward, and thus the defender will be forced to pay extra attention to either one, or may have to adjust his/her position to see both, which may come at the cost of breaking their team's formation. Forwards can capitalize on any of these moments to score a goal.

Forwards of the team in white shirts
making runs to provide their teammate
who has the ball with various options.

                                         
Hence, forwards of a team must contribute actively when they are 'off the ball' regardless of whether it's their team or the opposition in possession of the ball. They do an awful lot of running around, either towards the ball or opponents when the other team has it, or away from the ball and opponents into space when their own team has it.

Now, what do TEAM B's defensive players do when TEAM A has possession? Also, what do the defenders of TEAM A do when their forwards have the ball higher up the field?

Before we get to that, let us first recognize that although a single forward is the only requirement to score a goal, defence is a collective effort. Every single player must contribute to their teams defensive requirements, and defenders are largely responsible for coordinating this along with their goalkeeper as they are the ones who can see the most of the field. Hence a defender's role is much more 'passive' as compared to an attacker. Even though they often cover as much ground as an attacker, they do not run around much, unless they are deployed on the flanks. So what value does an individual high-quality defender add to the team, when defence is collectively a team effort? We'll figure that out in Part 3!

The 'Biased Basis' of the GOAT Debate- Part 1

In the history of sport, there has always been debate on the greatest ever with regards to a particular sport. However, when it comes to football, this topic is perhaps never ending and so open-ended, that there can never be a conclusive, and completely objective answer.

Sure, there are several names that crop up. Pele, Maradona, Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, 
Di Stefano, Ronaldo 'el Phenomeno', and Cruyff are perhaps the most common, although there are several others who can certainly stake their claim. But can we actually decide who the greatest ever is? All those names I mentioned do have one thing in common. They are all forwards or attack-minded players.

If you think about it, forwards or attack-minded players dominate headlines, shirts with their names are sold more, and most individual awards these days are won by them. Even the Ballon d'Or, considered to be the most prestigious individual prize in football, which has been awarded since 1965, seems to favour forwards, with 44 of them claiming the honour, compared to 14 midfielders, 5 defenders and just the one goalkeeper.

This of course seems befitting, seeing that these players are the ones with the most goals, assists, chances created and what not. However, just because these players have such a large number of goals, assists and dribbles among other easily available statistics, does it make them the greatest players of all time? 

Of course not. Several factors such as positioning, maintaining the offside trap, and of course, pure intimidation due to a player's presence are either never depicted or cannot be measured, and hence aren't taken into account while determining the GOAT. How then are we to determine the GOAT? Should we divide players into attack-minded and defense-minded and pick one from each? Maybe we can, or we can differentiate players on the basis of skill-sets and maybe try to better understand which skills are the ones which only the GOAT can have. (I will be considering only outfield players and not goalkeepers as the latter requires a completely different set of skills and has a very unique role)

Let us think of forwards- including attacking midfielders, wingers and strikers- as players who exhibit most of their talent or skill while they are 'on the ball'. Naturally, defenders- including centre-backs, defensive midfielders and full backs- are players who exhibit most of their talent or skill 'off the ball'. Now the average person watching the game will be drawn towards the step-overs, the bending crosses, the shimmies past the sliding tackles, and those inch-perfect, perfectly weighted through-balls, and everything else that requires 'forward skills', but if you're someone who actively follows and analyses the game, you'll be aware that all that is just one side of the coin.

A rock-sturdy shoulder push, a perfectly timed sliding tackle, the straight lines that have to be maintained to 'just catch' the lurking forward offside...all these often go unnoticed by most viewers. In recent times, defending has rightly been called as 'the lost art' by commentators, analysts and even former players. Gone are the days when teams had a Moore, a Beckenbauer or a Maldini. 

Nowadays we see 'wing-backs' crossing and centre-backs playing out from the back. Barcelona and Spain's famous 'tiki-taka' style of play that dominated world football from 2008-2012, is in it's very foundation, a defensive style that required highly skilled players instead of robust, tough-tackling ones. 'Traditional Defending' however, requires tremendous 'off the ball' skills.

However, good forwards also have a few 'off the ball' skills, such as the ability to make runs into space, and similarly, solid defenders often have an excellent first touch and an ability to deal with air-balls, which certainly qualify as 'on the ball' skills. 

Now that we have divided players into two different skill-sets rather than by position, let us focus on how much importance we must give to each set. Statistically speaking, players generally have the ball only for around 2-3 minutes per match. Hence, for around 87 minutes or more, the player's 'off the ball' skills are on display. How well a player utilizes these 87 minutes determine how effectively one can capitalize on those 2-3 minutes when those 'on the ball' skills are required. 

In this post, let us try to analyse what each player, depending on position or playing style, will be doing during those 2-3 minutes when he or she has the ball.

A defender or defensive minded player, will usually be involved in the slow monotonous drone of passing the ball around either in triangles, horizontally across the field or vertically upwards unless the opportunity for a long-ball or through-ball presents itself. 

However, should the ball be given away in a dangerous place, either through a miscued pass, a dreadful first touch, or simply by an opposing forward capitalizing on a moment of laziness, the consequences might be dreadful for the team. Hence, an individual mistake by a defensive player, or by one in a defensive role/position at that moment, may prove to be more costly for the team than an 'attacking' mistake.  

A forward or attack-minded player will either try to create chances, convert chances to goals and assists, or may simply be involved in either the build-up play or do all the necessary legwork to tire and stretch defences open, exposing gaps for others to exploit. 

Now should an attack-minded player fail to perform the desired role perfectly, there is always someone else who can take over and pinch that vital goal or create that 'comes only once in every game' chance. Several games, including major finals, have been won by pinching a goal through a set-piece or a scramble in the box. So if an 'individual' attacker fails to provide his dues in a match, it generally may not cost a team much in a negative sense, compared to an 'individual' defender giving the ball away in a dangerous area. 

How many times have we seen a forward not deliver and all commentators and experts will say "Oh, he/she's had a bad game" or "He/She's not been in good form lately"? More often than not, it's not because he/she has had a bad game, but it's probably because the opposing defenders would have been exceptional for those 87 minutes that they don't have the ball. More about that, on my next post!